Monday, June 1, 2015

rough draft


 

“I’m Done!” “No one is listening.” “There is no communication.” are all phrases heard from disgruntled or disconnected volunteers.  As the Director or Advisor of an organization it is important to keep things from getting to this point.  Written communication can play a key role in bringing people together, keeping them together and moving the group forward.  While written communication can be effective, it can also bring about adverse reactions, or confrontation.  Through a collection of Katherine Soule’s written documents – emails, PowerPoints, and survey analysis – she identifies her audience and employees the rhetorical appeals ethos, pathos, logos and kairos to address the disconnect of the volunteers of her organization and initiate positive change. 

Katherine Soule was tasked with bringing back harmony and effectiveness to the 4-H Youth Development Program of Santa Barbara County.  She took over in the summer of 2013.  Her position was Youth, Families, Community Advisor for San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara County through the University of California Cooperative Extension.  The Santa Barbara County 4-H Youth Development Program falls under this title.  This put her in charge of 2-3 office staff, over 200 volunteers and over 800 youth of Santa Barbara County.  4-H is a Youth Development Program that is an organization that uses volunteers to deliver a program based on experiential learning to youth ages 5-19.   The focus is to teach leadership, community awareness and service, and educational and agricultural projects.  When Katherine Soule took over there seemed to be a lot of discourse and disconnect between staff, volunteers and parents.  The volunteer Management Board, volunteer Program Development Board and staff were not communicating and were in conflict with each other.  Katherine explained when she took over, she felt like, “Everyone was out in the ocean all rowing their own boats.” She felt her main focus would have to be bringing them all together.

It is evident in the written archives she provided that she had to identify and focus on her audience and pay great attention to her purpose of bringing the group together.  This will be seen in emails, Power Point presentation and survey result summary. During the interview, she explained her realization that she had to respect that many of the volunteer’s identities were connected to their service and association to the 4-H Youth Development Program. The need for sensitivity, validation, and appreciation had to part of all her communications.

            The rhetorical tenants Katherine Soule uses throughout her writings are ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos. She employs the concept of ethos, which is explained as bringing credibility, expertise, or being well informed about the subject at hand (Losh, 2013,p.44), to establish the credibility and knowledge she brings to the situations she addresses. At times she uses quotes from others to further the credibility of what she is trying to establish. She explained how she feels the need to be respectful and sensitive to the individuals whose identities are related to their involvement with the organization so long.  Through the use of pathos she take great care to generate emotions that may lead the audience to be more accepting. (Lunsford, 2012, p.26) With Katherine being very academic by nature, it seems the most drawn upon concept is logos , “the appeal to reason, to the forcefulness of a well-though-out and well-structured position” (Losh, 2013, p.44)  She shows in  her writings that to bring about positive change it is logical that if we do x than y will come about. At times Katherine uses the feature of kairos, “the suitable time and place for making an argument and the most opportune way to make it.” (Lunford, 2012, p.27) She explained in certain instances she has to respond quickly to some problems when there is much controversy, emotions are high, or have high stakes, but all problems must be addressed in a timely manner.

            The first of Katherine’s artifacts is an email sent to inform the 4-H YDP staff and volunteer leaders of upcoming leadership training meetings. She is quick to identify her audience as the 4-H YDP Staff, Program Development Board, and Management Board and refers to them as ‘the leadership team that provides academic, administrative, and programming oversight.”  She shows that she knows of their feelings from conversations she has had over the last year, and is aware of the needs of her audience. By knowing and understanding her audience and their needs, she is able to identify the purpose for which she is addressing.

            The purpose of the email is to inform the “leadership team” of the training meetings she will be conducting, but also to address the number one problem of disconnect and lack of communication. Katherine lets them know she is aware of the problems and wants to “create greater community” and “foster a sense of camaraderie” within the leaders of the organization.  This is the true purpose of the communication, yet the communication is an invitation to receive training on three topics that are related to leadership strength, openness, and communication.  Lastly, her purpose for writing the email is to encourage them to want to get to know her better and have them know she wants to know them better. She to accomplish her purpose her uses a combination of ethos, logos, and pathos.

 She demonstrates ethos by beginning the email by showing she has put in the time listening to the current leadership and has made the 4-H YDP program’s needs a high priority.  This demonstrates her credibility for selecting a plan for improving relationships through the proposed trainings.  Katherine Soule uses a quote from Gallup. Inc. to show the credibility and validity of the training program.  With the addition of future dates and topics she shows her dedication to the program and demonstrates her planning and organization skills. By listing the topics that she has chosen speaks to the logic, logos, put forth in her plan to bring about change in the group through strengths, openness, and communicating.  These are all in answer to the complaints she had been hearing from many of the leaders. By dispatching the rhetorical appeal of ethos, she plays to her audience’s feeling of detachment by focusing on bringing the “leadership team” together.  She makes them feel she is attending to their needs and requests.  She closes with giving her audience the much needed appreciation for their “dedication and investment” in our youth.  The whole idea of the email is to let her audience know they have been heard and steps are being taken to improving the current situation and the leaderships concerns.

            Katherine Soule uses a Rogerian argument which Lunsford explains, “ Approaches audiences in nonthreatening ways, finding common ground and establishing trust among those who disagree about issues. Writers who take a Rogerian approach try to see where the other person is coming from, looking for “both/and” or “win/win” solutions whenever possible.” (2012,p.6)  This is seen in her efforts to bring a group with multiple views of problems together for the betterment of the program.  The only side or stand she seems to take is the side of progress and togetherness.

            The next artifact from Katherine is the PowerPoint presentation, “State of the Santa Barbara County 4-H YDP Address” she used to inform her audience of overall state of the organization. In this PowerPoint presentation she focuses on a much larger audience.  This audience she explains is a combination of the overall membership, volunteers at all levels, the general public (Stakeholder), and her academic peers. By having multiple audiences she had multiple purposes. The multiple purposes were to inform about the overall structure of program including management, planning, budgeting, assessment, policy and procedures, and diversity.  Pathos and ethos helped make the presentation reach her audience and purpose.

Katherine used pathos in the numbers and updates she provide to convey the feeling of accomplishment and satisfaction.  She is able to feed on the emotion of hope to inspire members and volunteers as well as appeal to the public (stakeholder) to rally and continue to support the program. By speaking to diversity she appealed to the feeling of reaching out and bring those on the outside into the organization. Ethos was featured in her use of graphs, flow charts, and outlines, showing her organization and her knowledge of the program. Her attention to the details demonstrate her focus on to the intricate parts of the organization. By using the University of California Cooperative Extension symbols and trademarks in the PowerPoint give it a sense of being credible and official. This PowerPoint presentation demonstrates Katherine’s ability to effectively identify and appeal to multiple audiences by using different rhetorical tenants to inform them of the state of the 4-H YDP. She was able to do this from a position of authority and leadership. While this artifact was intended for a large audience, some are for only one person.

In the next archive Katherine had to send this email in response to a single club leader that is also a member of the Program Development Board. Her primary audience is the one leader she is addressing, but is aware that her email may be shared with other leaders as well as it being copied to the 4-H office staff. Her purpose for this email is to address the concerns of the   leader who has explained her lack of trust and feels of not being heard. Katherine also realizes the need to inform the leader of the facts involved in a particular situation. An underlying purpose was to carefully admonishing the leader for missing an important meeting. Lastly she wanted to encourage the leader that change is coming and thank her for her service.

In this more personal email Katherine felt the need to use patho, logos, ethos, as well as kairos. In the opening of this email Katherine tries to make an emotional connection by mentioning the opportunity to meet the leader’s daughter.  She continues to try to connect by sharing her feeling of disappointment in the issue that is upsetting the leader. She appeals to the individual’s need to be heard and understood.  In the closing, she makes a point to show appreciation to appeal to the leader’s feelings of being needed and appreciated. Katherine employs logos to take care of address each concern of the individual in a very logical, orderly way.  She lets the reader know that the new structure of the 4-H YDP has brought about change and growth. Katherine suggests to the leader avenues to take if problems persist. Katherine explained that this particular issue was one that she felt the need to respond to in a very timely manner, and did so. In this email she demonstrates the importance of kairos. Katherine has to demonstrate expertise and knowledge, ethos, to correct the inaccurate misinformation. In this instance she must speak to the problem from a “well informed” stance. By her use of rhetorical appeals Katherine addressed and informed this leader and avoided further escalation of the issues of the leader.

In the final archive from Katherine is a Survey Results Summary. She again identifies her audience as a combination of the overall membership, volunteers at all levels, the general public (Stakeholder), and her academic peers. Her purpose was to create and present a needs assessment for the Santa Barbara County 4-H YDP. In her summary she uses numbers and percentages to show the credibility of her findings and conclusions. Along with her findings and conclusions she demonstrates ethos through the outline and structure of the document. She strived to emphasize that the results showed the overall feeling was that of satisfaction and quality in the program, but that there is still work to be done to bring about improvement. As in most of her writings she utilizes pathos to connect to the many volunteers by offering her appreciation for the commitment they have made to the youth of the organization.

By examining the various writing archives of Katherine Soule to the staff and volunteers of the Santa Barbara 4-H YDP, she successfully identifies her audiences.  She determines the purpose of her writings and effectively addresses them. By employing the use of Pathos, Ethos, Logos and Kairos she was effective in bringing about more unity within the organization and a more positive change of attitude. Katherine Soule demonstrated that by using different rhetorical tenants in her writing that she could guide the direction of the organization and help bring continuity to those who serve it.

 

Saturday, May 9, 2015

Academic Arguments

I found this week’s readings very helpful. I think there is something in each one I will look back on as I write future papers. In “Academic Arguments” I realized the importance of using Logos and backing it with research. I usually write more using Pathos, so it will be important for me to keep that in mind. I found the step-by-step techniques in the section, “Developing an Academic Argument” to be extremely helpful and will keep this close at hand.
“So What? Who Cares?” showed me to emphasize the importance and relevance of the points I write about. I also found the examples to be very helpful. I liked the part that explained,” when you explain who cares and why, it’s a little like bringing a cheerleading squad into your text.” (p.100)
In “Shitty First Drafts” I gleaned a lot from the author sharing the struggles she has when faced with writing and the ways she recommends overcoming them. I am not one to write a lot of drafts, but after reading this I just my give her way a try, plus that is how Zack has this class set up.
“Arguable Assertions” gave a good example of what evidence and claims are and the importance of interpreting the evidence and supporting your claims.

Overall I felt these readings will be helpful in many ways when I start to write the paper for this class.

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Rhetorical analysis readings


This week’s readings were longer than I really had time for this week. Not so much because of the amount of pages, but because of the amount of information I wanted to focus on in those pages. This seems to be what our focus is to be about for this class as well as the final project. “Rhetorical Analysis” again talked about the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos, and how to examine arguments based on each one. In regard to Pathos, I liked that it stated that “emotions can add real muscle to arguments”. I found Aristotle’s basic structure of logical arguments to be “statements” and “proof”. While that is the  basics, in rhetorical analysis you are looking at so much more. You look at who is saying what, who are the saying it to, why are they saying it, who benefits from what is said, and on and on. I believe I will be going back to this chapter over and over again to better understand how to write a rhetorical analysis.

I found “Finding Evidence” to be very helpful not only for doing a rhetorical analysis, but for any research. I have mostly used printed works and a few online resources, but was not too familiar with all the sources that were in this chapter. I found helpful the information given on personal ways to gather evidence like, conducting interviews, observations, and surveys.

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Request Email Draft

Writing Project, Diversity, Underserved ‏

Writing Project, Diversity, Underserved

To: Ron Vieira
Show this message...
From: Ron Vieira (ron.vieira@hotmail.com)
Sent: Sun 4/19/15 8:18 PM
To: Ron Vieira (ron.vieira@hotmail.com)
 Dear Dr. Katherine Soule,

As a student enrolled in an academic writing course at Antioch University, I am tasked with contacting a professional and requesting an interview and three to five writing artifacts. Since I am a leader in your organization, I felt choosing you would both assist me in my course as well as give me insight into your goals and efforts to reach the underserved and achieve greater diversity within the 4-H Youth Development Program. Any writing artifacts - emails, reports, training presentation, or analysis - you would be able to share with me would be greatly appreciated. I will be examining the content, purpose, and arguments in your writings, as well as your intended audience. Along with your writing artifacts, I would also be requesting a 30-45 minute interview to better learn about you and  your writings. I would be honored if you were able to assist me with your writings and time. I will contact you to arrange a time hat will fit your busy schedule.

Thank you,

Ron Vieira
Playa Del Sur 4-H
Community Club Leader
839 Viewcrest Dr.
Ventura, CA 93003
(805) 451- 4057
ron.vieira@Hotmail.com 

Friday, April 17, 2015

Electronic Messages


In “Writing Identities” we are again reminded to be aware of who our audience is.  Along with being aware of our audience, we must choose the correct identity in which to best meet their needs. Our identity needs to be suited to our audience. This was a great reminder to me as I must take on the identity of an event committee chair, a board member, or a leader dealing with youth. Each role I have has a different identity that I have to take on in order to successfully reach my audience. The reading shows how strongly your identity is connected to your Ethos.

“Crafting Messages for Electronic Media” seemed geared a little more toward the corporate world.  I did find a lot to be helpful, considering I’m not that comfortable communicating through emails. Creating effective subject line was very important to me. The overall section on emails will help me become more effective with the emailing communications that are required of me. Other than the blog we do for this class, I don’t do any blogging and I don’t take part in any podcast, so those sections didn’t mean too much to me at this point. The instant messaging that I take part in is very informal, I was unaware that it was done in business at a professional level.

“Crafting Electronic Messages” seemed to be another look at knowing your audience and purpose for your message. It touched on Ethos and establishing your credibility. I found the strategy for requests very helpful, and plan to review and use them with my requests for future fundraising event, board agenda items, and sponsorships.

Over all, these three readings will be a huge help for the upcoming assignment.  

Friday, April 10, 2015

Genres


I’m Ron. I have come to the point in my life where my focus is really on helping others and not so focused on myself. My passion has become working with young people and helping them believe in themselves, set goals, and find their success. I have been working with youth in the areas of leadership, citizenship and community service, and raising livestock. I find it very rewarding to see these middle school and high school students believe in themselves and do thing they never thought they could do. These young people are what is driving me to get a degree and become a counselor.

Being a visual learner, I found “Spaces for Writing” and “Why Rhetoric” an interesting change from textbooks. I liked the way they used images and text to explain their ideas. This is a method I use with the youth I work with, it keeps their attention and keep them engaged. It makes a great example of what they are trying to say in that writing rules can differ depending on your audience, purpose, or situation. I found the section on Ethos, Pathos, Logos, and Kairos interesting. I have never been taught any of that, but realized I employ them often in my communications with government officials, board members, parents, and youth.       

“Navigating Genres” was very informative and written in such a relaxing way. Kerry Dirk’s openness and easy reading style made learning about genres clear. The article shows how genres are used properly and in the appropriate setting, and touched on knowing your audience and considering the content. I felt that genre was explained very well through the ransom letter example. Again we were told about audience and purpose.

“Everything is an Argument” was very informative, but read too much like a textbook. The information was just introduced, an example was given, then moved to the next topic. I’m glad it was short.